A living, working, ethical document shaping education. Home

Search
   
Members

Calendar

Help

Home
Search by username
Not logged in - Login | Register 


Words
 Moderated by: djasbridge  

New Topic

Reply

Print
AuthorPost
djasbridge
Administrator


Joined: Sun Mar 4th, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 54
Status:  Offline
Mana: 
 Posted: Sat Mar 10th, 2007 01:40 pm

Quote

Reply
"Rights" "Without" "Labels"

Three words.

Technically, those three words could be aligned into a 3x2 factorial design, but I prefer to think of them as a 2x2 factorial, which would of course results in the following four possibilities:

a) Rights with labels (++);
b) Rights without labels (+-):
c) No rights with labels; or (-+)
d) No rights without labels (--).

In conceptualizing RWOL, most of us center in on the powerful term, "labels." But it's important not to forget the other all-important term, "rights."

Whether they are educational rights or civil rights, RWOL wants to provide them and protect them.

So let's rule out c and d as any kind of a viable option because in our model, we want student rights and powerful and appropriate education. Everyone would agree with that, right?

That leaves us with a choice between a and b. We want to provide educational rights, but do we want to label or not?

Our present system is a "Rights With Labels" system, for example, "We'll protect your rights, but only if we can call you LD!"

Take a little time and ask yourself how well that paradigm is working for our students.

RWOL proposes b: rights without labels (+-). It's pretty much that straightfoward.

Shall we label? Or not?


 Current time is 02:32 am




Powered by WowBB 1.7 - Copyright © 2003-2006 Aycan Gulez